This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 1: Overview Of Project PerformanceMeasurements, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: Hello, and welcome to part one of MPUGs Project PerformanceMeasurement course.
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 2: What to Measure and How to Report, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: And welcome to Part 2 of MPUG’s Project PerformanceMeasurement course.
It can be the needed performance of a measure - Effectiveness, Performance, Key Performance Parameter, or a TechnicalPerformanceMeasures. The specifics of the TechnicalPerformanceMeasures applied to inform Physical Percent Complete and the Cone of Uncertainty around the TPM are shown here.
If we look at the discipline of softwareengineering, we see that the microeconomics branch of economics deals more with the types of decisions we need to make as softwareengineers or managers. Softwareengineering economics." IEEE Transactions of SoftwareEngineering, 1 (1984): 4-21.
The Cone of Uncertainty is a framing assumption used to model the needed reduction in some parameter of interest in domains ranging from software development to hurricane forecasting. The Cone of Uncertainty as a TechnicalPerformanceMeasure. The Cone of Uncertainty as a TechnicalPerformanceMeasure.
What are the measures of physical percent complete needed to inform the decision makers of progress to plan in order to take corrective or preventive actions to stay on plan? Softwareengineering economics is about making decisions related to softwareengineering in a business context. A final Thought .
After having worked for outsourcing, consultancy and product companies I believe that creating a place where people really trust each other is easier when softwareengineers and stakeholders are both part of the same organization. Unfortunately, due to a variety of reasons, the feature was released with a huge delay.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates or any other project attribute (in this post, cost, schedule, and technicalperformance parameters). There can be cost and schedule performancemeasures as well.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technicalperformance parameters). This is due to many reasons. Prentice-Hall, 1981.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technicalperformance parameters). This is due to many reasons. Prentice-Hall, 1981.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technicalperformance parameters). This is due to many reasons. Prentice-Hall, 1981.
What are the measures of physical percent complete needed to inform the decision makers of progress to plan in order to take corrective or preventive actions to stay on plan? Softwareengineering economics is about making decisions related to softwareengineering in a business context. A final Thought .
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 100,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content