This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 1: Overview Of Project PerformanceMeasurements, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: Hello, and welcome to part one of MPUGs Project PerformanceMeasurement course.
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 2: What to Measure and How to Report, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: And welcome to Part 2 of MPUG’s Project PerformanceMeasurement course. Is it Eric?
It can be the needed performance of a measure - Effectiveness, Performance, Key Performance Parameter, or a Technical PerformanceMeasures. The specifics of the Technical PerformanceMeasures applied to inform Physical Percent Complete and the Cone of Uncertainty around the TPM are shown here.
With these business principles of software development and projects in general, we can ask and answer five principles of project success. What dos Done look like in units of measure meaningful to the decision makers? What is the Plan to reach done at the needed time for the needed budget, with the needed outcomes?
The Cone of Uncertainty is a framing assumption used to model the needed reduction in some parameter of interest in domains ranging from software development to hurricane forecasting. The Cone of Uncertainty as a Technical PerformanceMeasure. Closed Loop Control, has a goal, an action, a measurement, and a corrective action.
It lists the usual suspects for why those spending the money think they don't have to estimate how much they plan to spend when they'll be done producing the value they've been assigned to produce for that expenditure. When might we finish with the planned work? What might it cost to finish the planned work?
If we look at the discipline of softwareengineering, we see that the microeconomics branch of economics deals more with the types of decisions we need to make as softwareengineers or managers. Softwareengineering economics." IEEE Transactions of SoftwareEngineering, 1 (1984): 4-21.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). The Cone is NOT the result of the project's past performance.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). The Cone is NOT the result of the project's past performance.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates or any other project attribute (in this post, cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). There can be cost and schedule performancemeasures as well.
With these business principles of software development and projects in general, we can ask and answer five principles of project success. What dos Done look like in units of measure meaningful to the decision makers? What is the Plan to reach done at the needed time for the needed budget, with the needed outcomes?
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). The Cone is NOT the result of the project's past performance.
This is an immutable principle that impacts planning, execution, performancemeasures, decision making, risk, budgeting, and overall business and technical management of the project and the business funding the project no matter the domain, context, technology or any methods. Let's start with Mr. Bliss's chart.
In the project domain, an estimate is a calculated approximation of some desired measurement. This is usually a cost, a completion date, a performancemeasure used in a closed loop control system to keep the project GREEN while delivering the needed Capabilities to produce the Value for the customer at the needed time for the needed cost.
The Design Structure Matrix (DSM) method, was introduced by Steward in for task-based system modeling and initially used for planning issues. This always takes us back the coupling and cohesion discussion all of us who were SoftwareEngineers in the 1980's . Allen School of Computer Science SoftwareEngineering Course .
“Reducing Estimation Uncertainty with Continuous Assessment: Tracking the 'Cone of Uncertainty’” Pongtip Aroonvatanaporn, Chatchai Sinthop and Barry Boehm, Center for Systems and SoftwareEngineering University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90089, ASE’10 , September 20–24, 2010, Antwerp, Belgium, 2010. So here's the outcome.
The Design Structure Matrix (DSM) method, was introduced by Steward in for task-based system modeling and initially used for planning issues. This always takes us back the coupling and cohesion discussion all of us who were SoftwareEngineers in the 1980's . Allen School of Computer Science SoftwareEngineering Course .
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 100,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content