This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 1: Overview Of Project PerformanceMeasurements, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: Hello, and welcome to part one of MPUGs Project PerformanceMeasurement course.
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 2: What to Measure and How to Report, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: And welcome to Part 2 of MPUG’s Project PerformanceMeasurement course. Is it Eric?
There's a recent post titled Four Fallacious Reasons to Estimate. It lists the usual suspects for why those spending the money think they don't have to estimate how much they plan to spend when they'll be done producing the value they've been assigned to produce for that expenditure. Let's look at each one in more detail.
The CoU paradigm defines the needed reduction in uncertainty is some performance metric. This can be the confidence in the estimate for any variable. It can be the needed performance of a measure - Effectiveness, Performance, Key Performance Parameter, or a Technical PerformanceMeasures.
I've seen estimates abused by bad managers, so let's NOT estimate and that will fix the behavior of Bad Managers." While the human behaviors are real and observable, conjecturing that decisions can be made in the presence of uncertainty without estimating the outcome of those decisions, there is no principle to support that conjecture.
If we look at the discipline of softwareengineering, we see that the microeconomics branch of economics deals more with the types of decisions we need to make as softwareengineers or managers. Softwareengineering economics." IEEE Transactions of SoftwareEngineering, 1 (1984): 4-21.
The Cone of Uncertainty is a framing assumption used to model the needed reduction in some parameter of interest in domains ranging from software development to hurricane forecasting. The Cone of Uncertainty as a Technical PerformanceMeasure. The Cone of Uncertainty as a Technical PerformanceMeasure.
There is always lots of complaining about the biases introduced into managing projects and making the estimates needed to make project decisions. What are the measures of physical percent complete needed to inform the decision makers of progress to plan in order to take corrective or preventive actions to stay on plan?
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). There can be cost and schedule performancemeasures as well.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). Estimates are needed but are subject to large level of uncertainty.
Reducing Estimation Uncertainty with Continuous Assessment: Tracking the 'Cone of Uncertainty’” Pongtip Aroonvatanaporn, Chatchai Sinthop and Barry Boehm, Center for Systems and SoftwareEngineering University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90089, ASE’10 , September 20–24, 2010, Antwerp, Belgium, 2010. 37–48, 2007.
This is an immutable principle that impacts planning, execution, performancemeasures, decision making, risk, budgeting, and overall business and technical management of the project and the business funding the project no matter the domain, context, technology or any methods. All project work operates in the presence of uncertainty.
It is wrong to suppose that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it – a costly myth. This is used in support of the fallacy that estimates aren't needed to make decisions in the presence of uncertanty. Technical PerformanceMeasures. Why Guessing is not Estimating and Estimating is not Guessing.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates (cost and schedule) and other project attributes (cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). There can be cost and schedule performancemeasures as well.
Barry Boehm's work in “SoftwareEngineering Economics”. The Cone is a project management framework describing the uncertainty aspects of estimates or any other project attribute (in this post, cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters). There can be cost and schedule performancemeasures as well.
There is always lots of complaining about the biases introduced into managing projects and making the estimates needed to make project decisions. What are the measures of physical percent complete needed to inform the decision makers of progress to plan in order to take corrective or preventive actions to stay on plan?
This always takes us back the coupling and cohesion discussion all of us who were SoftwareEngineers in the 1980's . In the presence of uncertainty, estimates is needed to make decisions. There is no way out of this for any non-trivial software development project. This information comes from the Paul G.
This always takes us back the coupling and cohesion discussion all of us who were SoftwareEngineers in the 1980's . In the presence of uncertainty, estimates is needed to make decisions. There is no way out of this for any non-trivial software development project. This information comes from the Paul G.
All making things smaller dos is show that you're late, over budget, and what you're building (Technical PerformanceMeasures) doesn't work faster. So here are some books, handbooks, and guides that sit on my shelf that are used pretty much all the time on the Software Intensive System of Systems we work on. No References?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 100,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content