This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Instead, you would probably get more use out of investing your reading time in User Stories Applied: For Agile SoftwareDevelopment (Mike Cohn). I would suggest it’s User Stories Applied: For Agile SoftwareDevelopment by Mike Cohn. User Stories Applied for Agile SoftwareDevelopment by Mike Cohn.
Please find below a transcription of the audio portion of Fletcher Hearn’s session, Project PerformanceMeasurement – Part 2: What to Measure and How to Report, being provided by MPUG for the convenience of our members. Kyle: And welcome to Part 2 of MPUG’s Project PerformanceMeasurement course.
Agile softwaredevelopment is framed by a manifesto , a set of 12 principles, several methods. These are all focused on developingsoftware, delivering that software to those paying the developers. Anything less results in systems not worth having or fail to function or perform. [3],
It covered identifying requirements, interconnecting tasks, resources, planned values, actual values, baselines, performancemeasures, forecast techniques and timesheets. Flexibility in a defined direction is important in the digital space because things are moving so quickly.
The common definition of the Definition of Done in agile softwaredevelopment is (mostly from the Scrum Alliance and other official Scrum sites): A simple list of activities (coding, comments, unit testing, integration, release notes, design documents, etc.) These Measures have Little meaning to the Decision Makers.
PerformanceMeasurement Baseline. This creates a point of comparison of all the other baselines to evaluate project performance. It refers to all the change-related process that need to be performed during project execution. Optimistic Duration. It includes the coordination, management, and evaluation of project changes.
Earned Value Management (EVM) A systematic approach to project performancemeasurement assessing schedule and cost performance. Project A project is something that has a definite start and end (i.e., Dependency Mapping Identifying and documenting the relationships and dependencies between project tasks or activities.
Project Performance Management (#PPM). Technical PerformanceMeasures (#TPM). Cost, Schedule, and Technical Performance Management (#CSTPM). Product Development (#ProdDev). Agile SoftwareDevelopment (#ASD). Those lessons are directly transferable to the management of softwaredevelopment teams.
Although I understand measuring productivity could work well for repeatable activities, it's hard to believe it works well for abstract and, ultimately, non-repeatable tasks like softwaredevelopment. Thus, the common approach to "measure productivity" is to compare the estimates against what, in fact, happened.
The Cone of Uncertainty is a framing assumption used to model the needed reduction in some parameter of interest in domains ranging from softwaredevelopment to hurricane forecasting. The Cone of Uncertainty as a Technical PerformanceMeasure. The Cone of Uncertainty as a Technical PerformanceMeasure.
Landmark’s measure of success over these three years had much more to do with customer satisfaction and market share than with meeting knowingly aggressive targets. It's suggested from observations, the Cone of Uncertainty (CoU) is not a valid model of how uncertainty behaves in softwaredevelopment projects.
AHP was developed in the 1970s by Dr. Thomas Saaty. In our agile softwaredevelopment world, AHP is rarely found. Using this method, the performance, cost, time, and risks of alternatives can be articulated as ratios that can then be compared with one another. The Core Issue with Ordinal Measures . References . [1]
In softwaredevelopment, those managing the project have some understanding the market forces (from their marketing departments), the technology (from their engineering department), and how to manage in the presence of Aleatory and Epistemic risk (the managers running a successful firm). Softwaredevelopment is a non-ergodic process.
In the project domain, an estimate is a calculated approximation of some desired measurement. This is usually a cost, a completion date, a performancemeasure used in a closed loop control system to keep the project GREEN while delivering the needed Capabilities to produce the Value for the customer at the needed time for the needed cost.
Here's a simple definition of the Cone of Uncertainty: . The Measure that is modeled in the Cone the variable is the Quantitative basis of a control process that establishes the goal for the performancemeasure. This is a closed loop control system for managing the program with a T echnical PerformanceMeasure (TPM).
Here's a simple definition of the Cone of Uncertainty: . The Cone of Uncertainty describes the evolution of the measure of uncertainty during a project. The Measures that are modeled in the Cone of Uncertainty are the Quantitative basis of a control process that establishes the goal for the performancemeasures.
Here's a simple definition of the Cone of Uncertainty: . The Measure that is modeled in the Cone the variable is the Quantitative basis of a control process that establishes the goal for the performancemeasure. This is a closed loop control system for managing the program with a T echnical PerformanceMeasure (TPM).
This is an immutable principle that impacts planning, execution, performancemeasures, decision making, risk, budgeting, and overall business and technical management of the project and the business funding the project no matter the domain, context, technology or any methods. Cone of Uncertainty definition (Wikipedia).
Definition: The phase in a project lifecycle where project requirements are fleshed out, solutions analyzed, and the initial project plan charted out. Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM): An agile softwaredevelopment methodology that uses an iterative, incremental approach to project execution.
Cohesion is the measure of how well module fits together. This might be the actual definition of Independent fro the User Story. There is no way out of this for any non-trivial softwaredevelopment project. Allen School of Computer Science Software Engineering Course . harder to understand and not reusable.
Cohesion is the measure of how well module fits together. This might be the actual definition of Independent fro the User Story. There is no way out of this for any non-trivial softwaredevelopment project. Allen School of Computer Science Software Engineering Course . harder to understand and not reusable.
Yeah, I’ve been in environments where I said we wanted to have a team and, you know, over the years we have outsourced all of development. So you definitely can have that right. And, you know, ultimately the thing that slows softwaredevelopment down is fear of change. Also, review performancemeasures.
For approaches that have been implemented on existing systems, obtaining such understanding may require measurement and analysis. For scenarios where the project under consideration does not yet exist, performance prediction using analytical modeling or simulation is necessary. Let's start with a definition.
Melanie: Jeff is currently the Training and Development Manager for Edwards Performance Solutions. As such, he oversees the production and maintenance of courses on project management, systems engineering, softwaredevelopment, business process improvement, and cyber security. Jeff, a big MPUG welcome back.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 100,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content