Scrum.org

OCTOBER 2, 2018

If you’re a veteran of the software industry, you probably remember those days where we released to production/GA every couple of months. In contexts of growing business and technical uncertainty, those with the fastest feedback loop win. What we REALLY mean when we say Working Software. Can it also be a release cadence?

Cadence 156

Cadence Development Team Review Technical Review Software Review 156

Scrum.org

JANUARY 4, 2022

It is a container event, which means that it contains all other events, including Sprint Planning, the Daily Scrum, the Sprint Retrospective, and the Sprint Review. The duration of the Sprint is timeboxed to a maximum of one month, establishing a cadence within which the Scrum team works together to deliver value. Conclusion.

SCRUM 228

SCRUM 2020 Cadence Technical Review 228

Leading Agile

APRIL 24, 2019

Tech Infrastructure != Many organizations divide their technology stack between front-end and back-end systems and place an API boundary between the two. I’m including all IT resources “in front of” the API layer in the organization’s technical infrastructure. Value Stream. Half-Agile Transformations.

Technical Review 120

Technical Review Agile Cadence Infrastructure 120

Scrum.org

OCTOBER 2, 2018

If you’re a veteran of the software industry, you probably remember those days where we released to production/GA every couple of months. In contexts of growing business and technical uncertainty, those with the fastest feedback loop win. What we REALLY mean when we say Working Software. Can it also be a release cadence?

Cadence 150

Cadence Development Team Review Technical Review Software Review 150

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

To use the leadership styles model we discuss in the Leading SAFe class - the starting point is more of an orchestrating and technical expert kind of leadership stance and the goal should be to evolve towards a more serving the team and the process style over time. SAFe has a cadence at the Team and Program levels.

SCRUM 123

SCRUM Development Team Review Technical Review Cadence 123

Scrum.org

APRIL 11, 2019

Delivering working software is perceived as an IT responsibility instead of a Business-IT collaboration. I was successful with optimising for feature size that could be delivered in a two-sprint cadence. Connect the dots by making reporting on market research data and customer feedback data a mandatory item of the Sprint Review.

Underperforming Technical Team 180

Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM Development Team Review Software Review 180

Scrum.org

MARCH 14, 2023

And in the 21st century for software development teams, this means realizing the paradigm of Continuous Delivery. Plus, the technical capabilities in the form of teams focused on the value as goals and priorities. After focusing, delivering goes – as a shift towards creating customer-facing self-managing teams.

Agile 225

Agile Cadence Technical Review Development Team Review 225

Digite

MARCH 12, 2018

That is, does the question below, which I answered on a technical forum recently, describe a situation you might be facing or may have faced in the past? In my over 25+ years in the software industry, this has been an all too familiar situation! I have often wondered – doesn’t speak too well of us as software professionals!

Development Team Review 154

Development Team Review Software Review Cadence Technical Review 154

Scrum.org

MAY 27, 2021

“Such teams are typically well suited to periods of disruption, given their ability to adapt to fast-changing business priorities, disruptive technology, and digitization.”. We know Agile is not just for software teams. 4 – The Review. At the end of the sprint, after the Review, you have the Retrospective.

Agile 191

Agile Cadence Technical Review Software Review 191

Scoro

OCTOBER 14, 2024

Many teams try to track projects manually using spreadsheets or basic software tools. And may also sync with other tools in your tech stack. Review projects regularly Set up a regular cadence for project monitoring. This lack of clarity can cause project errors, missed deadlines, and budget overruns.

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

To prevail in today’s game of an accelerated innovation-based competition—software is eating the world—, every organization needs to acquire a holistic understanding of an agile product creation process: A vision leads to a strategy that (probably) results in a portfolio of products (and services).

Software Review 194

Software Review Cadence Technical Review SCRUM 194

Leading Agile

JULY 28, 2022

They depend on the software or product they produce and their audience or market. Improved Quality of Software or Product. And whether you are producing software or some other product, the process can be applied to many different contexts. Desired business outcomes are unique to each organization or business. Cost Savings.

Agile 127

Agile Technical Review Cadence Software Review 127

Digite

FEBRUARY 13, 2018

In this article, he outlines the similarities of the two as WIP Limiting, Pull-based systems – with cadences and a focus on learning – while also explaining their differences. Both methodologies believe in delivering software incrementally to maximize the opportunity to get feedback and capture ROI. Cheers, Mahesh Singh.

Cadence 94

Cadence SCRUM Lean Underperforming Technical Team 94

Redbooth

APRIL 26, 2018

If you work in tech or any industry where things change fast, you probably are familiar with agile project management. The model has been favored by software engineers for its efficacy and flexibility, and it’s beginning to catch on in agencies and startups. Cut down work periods through sprints, daily standups, and reviews.

Agile 128

Agile Technical Review Cadence Software Review 128

Scrum.org

JULY 31, 2023

They did not have the skills or authorization to make software and configuration changes in the banking systems. Their work was restricted to: specifying changes requested by the operational teams, assigning them as tasks to technical teams somewhere in the adjacent IT group, chasing progress.

Technical Review 172

Technical Review Software Review 2022 2021 172

Agilemania

DECEMBER 2, 2021

SAFe endorses alignment, transparency, collaboration, and product delivery involving large size teams.The core of SAFe is based on four bodies of knowledge which are agile software development, lean product development, systems thinking, and DevOps. Apply cadence and synchronize with cross-domain planning. Take an economic view.

Technical Review 98

Technical Review Agile Software Review Lean 98

Inloox

JULY 1, 2021

What usually started in software development can now be extended to the entire company and thus, change the way people collaborate. Large corporations in particular, which are in urgent need of more agility due to entrenched structures, usually have the hardest time implementing an agile transformation. But it’s not that easy.

Technical Review 100

Technical Review Lean 2011 Cadence 100

Planview

JUNE 1, 2021

Hosted by CITF, the UK’s leading membership organization for technology professionals, the webinar includes our insights and recommendations on extending Agile practices. Read on to review some answers to questions asked during the webinar along with a few of our other recommendations.

Cadence 148

Cadence Logistics Lean Agile 148

Leading Answers

MARCH 7, 2019

When our projects undertake defined, repeatable work using technologies and approaches our organizations have experience in, then uncertainty and change rates are typically low and manageable. The development team wants interesting work using new technology and skills to further their craft.

Software Review 101

Software Review Technical Review Risk Management Software Developers 101

Leading Agile

APRIL 7, 2023

That having weekly planning cadences; daily standups, reviews, and retrospectives would give people a reason to get in the same room and collaborate. Things really take off with the advent of the CSM certification and PMI finally recognizing Agile as a legitimate way to do software project management. Total chaos.

Agile 133

Agile Government Governance Underperforming Technical Team 133

MPUG

MARCH 8, 2021

It’s usually based on a cadence. As shown in the above figure, there is no regular timeboxed iteration, but incremental delivery can happen in cadence. When you fire a gun in the dark, it’s difficult to aim due to the lack of light. Developers, with all due respect to them, are generally optimistic people.

Lean 64

Lean Software Review Technical Review Agile 64

Digite

JUNE 13, 2018

Anderson best articulated its application to software development, in 2013, in the foundational book Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business, and its adoption hasn’t been as universal as Scrum’s during the early days of Agile software development. Creating Your First Kanban Board.

Agile 110

Agile Technical Review Cadence Software Review 110

Planio

JANUARY 11, 2021

Timing and team cadence: Decouple team cadences whenever possible. A major part of project management is adding restraints and order to the chaos of building software. Timing and team cadence: Decouple team cadences whenever possible. Finally, you could avoid company-wide cadence entirely like the team at Gumroad.

Underperforming Technical Team 88

Underperforming Technical Team Cadence CTO Hire Technical Review 88

Leading Agile

AUGUST 22, 2018

The Slippery Slope of “Yes” In many cases, stakeholders of technical teams ask for everything they can imagine they might need. Let’s say you’re using a two-week cadence, as that’s pretty typical and is what most agile coaches recommend as a starting point. The important thing is the mean cycle time.

Underperforming Technical Team 82

Underperforming Technical Team Cadence Technical Review Software Review 82

Leading Agile

JULY 18, 2023

Third, how are we reproducing working tests in software? When people make such statements, they usually mean that they have trained product owners and a proficient Scrum master, and their team consistently follows the cadence of sprint planning, daily stand-ups, interviews, and retrospectives. First, how are we forming teams?

Agile 118

Agile Software Review Certification Technical Review 118

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

As we will see, agile methods are, to a degree, a response to the kind of risks that software development projects face. What agile adds to this, therefore, is a distinct cadence of its own iterations or drawdowns of tasks into the Work in Progress part of the Kanban Board. Rapid development in the technology available.

Risk Management 98

Risk Management Risk Agile Technical Review 98

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

It’s time now to move forward to the next level of proficiency in software delivery; what we might call “post-Agile.” Today, some of the same principles seem to present impediments or unnecessary challenges for many teams and organizations. How can the same principle be a good idea in 2002 and a bad idea in 2019?

Agile 116

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 116

Agilemania

DECEMBER 13, 2021

The groundwork for SAFe was formed in 4 knowledge areas – agile software development, lean product development, systems thinking, and DevOps. Apply cadence and synchronize with cross-domain planning. You need to factor in the consensus of senior management and embraced by managers, technical team leaders, and other employees.

Agile 98

Agile Lean Software Review Technical Review 98

Leading Agile

AUGUST 13, 2018

Technical teams who are building or supporting application software usually work from a prioritized list of improvements, new features, and ideas to try out. All that unplanned activity used to create stress for technical workers. New software appears at the end of the line like clockwork. There will be stress.

Software Review 100

Software Review Technical Review Cadence SCRUM 100

Planio

JULY 4, 2022

Sprint review ceremony. Agile ceremonies — also known as Scrum ceremonies or just ‘events’ — are specific events that provide a structured framework for iterative software development processes. Agile is an umbrella term for different iterative and feedback-driven software development processes. (And why do they matter?).

Agile 88

Agile Technical Review Development Team Review Software Review 88

Leading Agile

APRIL 4, 2023

The Scaled Agile Framework wasn’t exactly what the authors of the Agile Manifesto imagined 20 years ago when they set out to define a better way of building software. It requires the ability to continuously deploy software, to continuously get feedback on it. We do reviews and retrospectives, right?

Technical Review 115

Technical Review Agile SCRUM Government 115

Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 8, 2024

This domain facilitates strategic alignment, optimized delivery cadence, methodology customization, increased flexibility, and improved risk management. The desire for a project management framework that sustains deliverability, supports the required cadence, and remains faithful to an adaptable methodology is now within reach.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team Cadence Development Team Review Technical Review 52

Planio

AUGUST 9, 2021

What is the best project scheduling software to use? Monday.com: Best for non-technical teams. Ask each person to help estimate their workload, uncover dependencies, and set deadlines for due dates. If you’re using Agile, you’ll want to determine a sprint cadence that will let you hit your quarterly OKRs. (We

Software Review 78

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Agile 78

Velociteach

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

Projects using well-understood solutions and technologies require less rigor. Problem complexity, technical complexity, compliance requirements, and the cost of change factor into this decision. Projects where the problem and technical complexity are low, and the cost of change is high may favor a predictive methodology.

Planning 52

Planning Technical Review Government Governance 52

Planio

AUGUST 1, 2022

For most development teams and startups, ‘becoming Agile’ starts and ends with how you build software. According to research published in Harvard Business Review , nearly 90% of companies struggle to complete Agile transformations — even after successful pilot projects. Pro tip: Use the right technology to empower your Agile teams.

Agile 78

Agile Technical Review Leadership Infrastructure 78

Planio

APRIL 24, 2023

Updating project management software to keep their team on track 9. Then, he works with technical software development experts to estimate the duration of each task and plots it onto a Gantt chart. Find the right meeting cadence for you and your team. Creating actionable project plans 5.

Development Team Review 78

Development Team Review 2030 Underperforming Technical Team Risk Management 78

Leading Agile

JANUARY 21, 2021

So it’s like the ability to form teams, the ability to create clear backlogs the ability to get to a working tested increment of software at the end of every sprint. So again, I’m anchoring not on feature level agility that we often talk about when it comes like agile software development but how do I pivot an organization?

Sustainability 111

Sustainability Agile SCRUM Technical Review 111