Scrum.org

OCTOBER 2, 2018

In contexts of growing business and technical uncertainty, those with the fastest feedback loop win. These are nice levels of transparency that are much better than just reviewing documentation of course, but they leave a lot to be desired. Their REAL feedback loop takes weeks if not months to close. The reason is empiricism.

Cadence 150

Cadence Development Team Review Technical Review Software Review 150

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

To use the leadership styles model we discuss in the Leading SAFe class - the starting point is more of an orchestrating and technical expert kind of leadership stance and the goal should be to evolve towards a more serving the team and the process style over time. SAFe has a cadence at the Team and Program levels.

SCRUM 123

SCRUM Development Team Review Technical Review Cadence 123

Scrum.org

JANUARY 14, 2021

Empiricism via working integrated increments every Sprint - System Demo & Nexus Sprint Review meeting a common Definition of “Done”. The Nexus Sprint Review and the System Demo are similar events happening on a similar cadence - every several weeks (Sprint/Iteration). Important Differences. Nexus - ART.

Cadence 107

Cadence Technical Review Development Team Review Lean 107

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

Apparently, there is a difference in the inspect & adapt cadence when product strategy and Sprint Backlog are compared to each other. The product roadmap needs to be adapted to the learnings from running product experiments regularly in an appropriate cadence to meet that standard.

Software Review 194

Software Review Cadence Technical Review SCRUM 194

Scoro

OCTOBER 14, 2024

And may also sync with other tools in your tech stack. Here, it’d make sense to pay close attention to overdue tasks, to have no more than 10% of tasks overdue at the end of each month. Review projects regularly Set up a regular cadence for project monitoring.

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

Agilemania

DECEMBER 2, 2021

Apply cadence and synchronize with cross-domain planning. Finally, let’s cut the suspense and closely at the common reasons to use SAFe. In the Scaled Agile Framework, every team member works diligently. Marketing teams on the other hand have to work diligently to deliver promised results to the clients.

Technical Review 98

Technical Review Agile Software Review Lean 98

Scrum.org

JULY 31, 2023

Their work was restricted to: specifying changes requested by the operational teams, assigning them as tasks to technical teams somewhere in the adjacent IT group, chasing progress. The queue of work was huge due to the long waiting times for the work in progress. They were wasting time chasing their changes to be delivered.

Technical Review 172

Technical Review Software Review 2022 2021 172

Leading Agile

NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Owns its technology stack. That’s six Sprint Planning sessions, six daily standups, six reviews, and retrospectives. Basically, you’re going to have some sort of early “big room” planning session on one end of the PI Plan and a closing ceremony on the other end. You’d have a multiple technology problem.

Agile 127

Agile Technical Review SCRUM Cadence 127

Planio

JANUARY 11, 2021

Timing and team cadence: Decouple team cadences whenever possible. Timing and team cadence: Decouple team cadences whenever possible. Agile teams rely on a clear sprint cadence to keep projects moving, remove bottlenecks, and ship great software. Even this has to be followed-up very closely by you.”.

Underperforming Technical Team 88

Underperforming Technical Team Cadence CTO Hire Technical Review 88

Leading Agile

APRIL 7, 2023

We pull the customer close. That having weekly planning cadences; daily standups, reviews, and retrospectives would give people a reason to get in the same room and collaborate. The technology architecture? I imagine it went down something like this. We have these small teams working on troubled projects. Total chaos.

Agile 133

Agile Governance Government Underperforming Technical Team 133

MPUG

MARCH 8, 2021

It’s usually based on a cadence. As shown in the above figure, there is no regular timeboxed iteration, but incremental delivery can happen in cadence. When you fire a gun in the dark, it’s difficult to aim due to the lack of light. Developers, with all due respect to them, are generally optimistic people.

Lean 64

Lean Software Review Technical Review Agile 64

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

What agile adds to this, therefore, is a distinct cadence of its own iterations or drawdowns of tasks into the Work in Progress part of the Kanban Board. Rapid changes in the market demand arising from social trends, competitor activities, or technical capability, for example. Rapid development in the technology available.

Risk Management 98

Risk Management Risk Agile Technical Review 98

Agilemania

JANUARY 19, 2022

It would be better if you could get someone knowledgeable to review it. Review all the answers before submitting. Web-based, closed book , no outside assistance, timed. Cadence synchronize with crossdomain planning. Establishing team and technical agility (3%). Know more about SPC: Become a Skilled SAFe® SPC.

Certification 98

Certification Lean Technical Review Consulting 98

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

Because the recovery phase was not officially recognized (typically due to time reporting rules that prohibited honesty regarding overtime), management missed the opportunity to learn from experience and repeated the death march pattern again and again. Stable Team. Projects are assigned to stable, pre-existing teams. Next Steps.

Agile 116

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 116

Leading Agile

AUGUST 13, 2018

Technical teams who are building or supporting application software usually work from a prioritized list of improvements, new features, and ideas to try out. All that unplanned activity used to create stress for technical workers. Unexpected or unplanned work isn’t always due to “defects.” There will be stress.

Software Review 100

Software Review Technical Review Cadence SCRUM 100

Planio

APRIL 24, 2023

But over the years, project managers have learned to follow a strict project lifecycle, which helps them manage every step of the journey, from establishing initial goals to handover and closing. Then, he works with technical software development experts to estimate the duration of each task and plots it onto a Gantt chart.

Development Team Review 78

Development Team Review 2030 Underperforming Technical Team Risk Management 78

Planio

AUGUST 9, 2021

Monday.com: Best for non-technical teams. Ask each person to help estimate their workload, uncover dependencies, and set deadlines for due dates. If you’re using Agile, you’ll want to determine a sprint cadence that will let you hit your quarterly OKRs. (We What is the best project scheduling software to use?

Software Review 78

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Agile 78

Scrum.org

AUGUST 9, 2022

indicated that there is still a challenging situation between their IT (sometimes called Delivery, Tech, etc.) Technology departments struggle with empathizing with Business, customer-faced teams, not understanding how hard their work is. organizations, I encountered close collaboration between parties. Remember about cadences.

Technical Review 215

Technical Review Cadence 2005 Initiating 215

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management Briefings and Presentations. Technical Performance Measures (#TPM). Cost, Schedule, and Technical Performance Management (#CSTPM). Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management. Table of Contents (Click the Name to go to Section).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement 2003 Governance 42

Leading Agile

MARCH 31, 2020

. – I was working in my office down in technology Parkway. You leave like pretty close and you’re thinking about this in very similar ways. You get super clear backlogs, you find out what the real cadences you’ve finished work that you start. And BPR was about the technology. How do you like fix it?

Agile 69

Agile Technical Review SCRUM Engineering 69

Wrike

DECEMBER 20, 2021

However, this interaction will require the use of new technology and strategies to manage it properly. Some tasks are more easily carried out when team members are located close to one another. Technology plays a huge role in that. There are many advantages to having face-to-face interaction with employees.

2022 41

2022 Artificial Inteligence Technical Review Cadence 41

Leading Agile

APRIL 20, 2023

But basically agile small teams working together are close to the surface. So this is why agile teams work and it’s also why we actually want Agile teams in Big Waterfall, big complex projects because we need those teams to operate close servers. Some organizations do operations reviews or bigger retrospectives.

Agile 62

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Cadence SCRUM 62

Leading Agile

JUNE 29, 2023

My dad is a rocket scientist, and we went to Georgia Tech, where they had installed a nuclear reactor. So, who is responsible for closing that gap? Our technologies often impede our ability to achieve our goals in infrastructure and operations. Are Executives Getting in the Way of Agile? Have you ever heard of Digital?

Agile 77

Agile Technical Review Executing Influencer 77

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the code for claim that is on the screen now, that’s mpugwebnlearn091819.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40

MPUG

MAY 18, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. I’ll also invite you to stay on after the event and the recording closes. Here’s an example of a technical issue. Lewis’ and James Mills JR.’s

Agile 59

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Cadence 59

Leading Agile

OCTOBER 3, 2023

And so we ended up with a lot of folks doing standups and sprint planning and story cards and sticky notes and burndown charts and reviews and retrospectives. And so you think about it, matrixed organizations are a problem, like technical coupling of cohesion issues are a problem. Oh, that’s actually what I want.

Governance 62

Governance Government SCRUM Agile 62

Workamajig

JANUARY 11, 2021

Administrative Closure: A list of the requirements necessary to formally close the project. Authorization Points: Specific points during the course of a project at which the sponsor reviews the business case and approves the project onwards. Final Account: The account that's responsible for finally closing a contract.

Underperforming Technical Team 60

Underperforming Technical Team Project Life Cycle Estimate Software Review 60

Leading Agile

JULY 3, 2023

But as companies scale, as the market shifts and more parts of the business become software-focused, there’s been an increase in demand for an end-to-end solution to help large organizations build infrastructure around sound technical practices. I’m Matt VanVleet, the Chief Technology Officer for Leading Agile. So get numbers.

Fractional CTO 126

Fractional CTO Software Review Technical Review Agile 126

Scrum.org

MARCH 11, 2024

Every activity required to achieve the Product Goal, such as Sprint Planning, Daily Scrums, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective, occurs within Sprints. It is all about getting things out of the door, thus closing the feedback loop and starting another round of inspection and adaption.

Technical Review 206

Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team SCRUM Software Review 206

Scrum.org

MARCH 28, 2022

All the work necessary to achieve the Product Goal, including Sprint Planning, Daily Scrums, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective, happen within Sprints. It is all about getting things out of the door, thus closing the feedback loop and starting another round of inspection and adaption. . 28 Sprint Anti-Patterns.

SCRUM 201

SCRUM Technical Review Software Review Consulting 201

MPUG

JUNE 1, 2022

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. The planning, the executing, the monitoring, controlling, and hopefully you’re getting it right and refining and improving until bam, closing. Melanie: Hello.

PMI 59

PMI Software Review Estimate Risk Management 59

Scrum.org

MARCH 2, 2025

TL; DR: AI in Agile Product Teams I have been interested in how artificial intelligence as an emerging technology may shape our work since the advent of ChatGPT; see my various articles on the topic. The teams agile approach allowed them to quickly adapt when new AI models became available, swapping in improved technology within Sprints.

Agile 184

Agile Technical Review Generative AI Artificial Inteligence 184

Scrum.org

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024

. #4 Get fast feedback We have technical feedback (building the thing right) and customer feedback (building the right thing). Broken feedback loops will disrupt the system's flow and create rework and technical debt. Reflection: Technical feedback can be improved by encouraging close collaboration between members of different teams.

Cadence 195

Cadence Technical Review Software Review Agile 195

Leading Agile

AUGUST 20, 2018

An unattended software delivery pipeline frees technical staff to spend more time on value-add activities rather than tediously performing repetitive tasks by hand, such as. Reviewing code by eyeballing it to ensure compliance with coding standards. Two closely related conceptual errors appear to be quite common.

Software Review 77

Software Review Software Technical Review Development Team Review 77