This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. McMahon, Cross Talk: The Journal of Defense SoftwareEngineering , July/August 2015, pp. Architecting Large Scale Agile Software Development: A Risk–Driven Approach,” Ipek Ozkaya, Michael Gagliardi, Robert L. Kirkeboen, G., &
These results aren’t surprising given the recent surge in attention to gender issues in workplaces, from the #MeToo movement over the past few months to Sheryl Sandberg’s 2013 bestseller Lean In. But they still hit a nerve. I have to go to extremes to prove myself every single time I walk into a new setting.”
“Effort Estimation of Use Cases for Incremental Large-Scale Software Development,” Pareastoo Mohagheghi, Bente Anda, and Reidat Conradi, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Softwareengineering. Software Development Effort Estimation using Fuzzy Bayesian Belief Network with COCOMO II,” B. 5, October 2013.
The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ‒ Steve McConnell. Software quality measurement,” Magne Jørgensen, Advances in EngineeringSoftware 30 (1999) 907–912.
Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification,” Marvin Carr, Suresh Konda, Ira Monarch, Carlo Ulrich, and Clay Walker, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, SoftwareEngineering Institute, June 1993. IEEE Transactions on SoftwareEngineering , Vol. SoftwareEngineering Institute, January 1996. De Meyer, C. Loch, and M.
Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification,” Marvin Carr, Suresh Konda, Ira Monarch, Carlo Ulrich, and Clay Walker, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, SoftwareEngineering Institute, June 1993. IEEE Transactions on SoftwareEngineering , Vol. SoftwareEngineering Institute, January 1996. De Meyer, C. Loch, and M.
I can imagine some softwareengineers taking umbrage at that comment. In 2013 I described a conference session Pelrine facilitated in which we explored this concept in 2009. Even if they were invited to the table, they would have relatively little to contribute.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 100,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content