Planio

FEBRUARY 17, 2019

So you want a software engineering job at Facebook/Apple/Amazon/Google/Netflix? It’s every software engineer’s dream to work with one of the top technical teams in the world. So how do you get a software engineering job at one of these companies? Step 1: Are you ready to apply for a top software engineering job?

Software Engineering 155

Software Engineering Technical Review Engineering Software Review 155

Digite

JANUARY 7, 2018

This is the original book where David Anderson first laid down the definition of and guidance to the Kanban Method for software and knowledge work. This is the original book where David Anderson first laid down the definition of and guidance to the Kanban Method for software and knowledge work. By David J Anderson. By Mike Burrows.

Lean 79

Lean Software Review 2010 2014 79

Leading Agile

SEPTEMBER 24, 2018

I frequently read and hear that software developers must take care to deliver the right solutions. The Developers Who Don’t Do Anything. I would observe lack of preparation is a cause of poor quality software. It tends to lead people to copy and paste code from StackOverflow. It’s true. Not My Job.

Software Developers 101

Software Developers Software Development Software Review Software 101

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 5, 2018

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ? This variation can be explained by the fact that initial concepts do not describe the final software system accurate enough.

2012 48

2012 2007 2011 2010 48

Wrike

MAY 23, 2023

Together, we have developed a unique quality control system for Wrike, our lovely project management platform, allowing us to deploy product code to production more quickly and without bugs. As our client base grew, so too did our responsibility to ensure high-quality product code. But he was wrong — Team Sky won in just three.

Engineering 36

Engineering Underperforming Technical Team Controlling Software Review 36

Agilemania

DECEMBER 13, 2021

The groundwork for SAFe was formed in 4 knowledge areas – agile software development, lean product development, systems thinking, and DevOps. Code Quality. Spotify: Spotify came into being in 2012. In the Scaled Agile Framework, every team member works diligently. Architecture and Design Quality.

Agile 98

Agile Lean Software Review Technical Review 98

Leading Agile

JUNE 18, 2018

Defensive programming consists of learning and using guidelines for software design and coding that tend to minimize the frequency and severity of problems in production. The day came when the software community more-or-less forgot about defensive programming. I guess that worked out okay for a generation of developers.

Software Review 103

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Artificial Inteligence 103

The IIL Blog

APRIL 27, 2018

To this end, expenditures that are reviewed to ensure that a team will function optimally might include factors such as: Web-based platforms for collaboration, i.e., WebEx or GoToMeeting. Resources: Number of participants, software, and systems required, facilities, etc. Webcam equipment for real-time video conversation.

2004 121

2004 Software Review 2012 PMI 121

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 15, 2020

If we look at the Stacey Matrix adapted for software development, a complex domain is where there are more unknown variables that cannot be predicted and there is no definite path to reach the goal. In the movie Avengers (2012), The Mind Stone allows the user to control the minds of others and can control what they do.

SCRUM 180

SCRUM Development Team Review 2012 Technical Review 180

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 25, 2020

When I started using Scrum as a software developer back in 2007 I noticed that this new ways of working really worked, then I decided to learn more about and I became a Scrum Master in 2012 and in 2015 I started to teach Scrum, overcoming my fear of public speaking. I will explain the peer review at the end of this article.

2017 174

2017 2018 2016 SCRUM 174

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 15, 2018

Some years ago — in 2012 — I experienced my first Professional Scrum Master class. Here was a trainer who was obviously not in it for the money, but was sincerely trying to improve the profession of software development. Although I had been teaching and training Scrum since 2012, it was never as a Professional Scrum Trainer.

SCRUM 132

SCRUM 2012 2018 Software Review 132

Teamweek

JUNE 25, 2020

Incredibly, it took almost four years to launch it commercially in 2012. Here’s a review from SoftwareAdvice that sums up the frustration that teams have Asana. This Asana review on G2 , describes how frustrating it is to navigate across Asana’s features. While really powerful, Asana is not for everyone. Too Complex.

Underperforming Technical Team 97

Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Planning Development Team Review 97

Scrum.org

AUGUST 17, 2020

The fallacy happens when we conclude from this that punishment works, and rewards don’t (Defulio, 2012). When comparing different approaches to develop software, survival bias can lead someone to conclude that plan-driven approaches work well based on a few success stories they have where they did. How to reduce this bias.

2015 223

2015 2014 2004 Influencer 223

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. Nord, CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering , May/June 2013.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Scrum.org

NOVEMBER 15, 2018

Some years ago — in 2012 — I experienced my first Professional Scrum Master-class. Here was a trainer who was obviously not in it for the money, but was sincerely trying to improve the profession of software development. Although I had been teaching and training Scrum since 2012, it was never as a Professional Scrum Trainer.

SCRUM 96

SCRUM 2012 2018 Software Review 96

Herding Cats

JULY 24, 2017

Shipping on time, to specifications, and within budget might be meaningless if a competitor is shipping software that has a greater value to the market. It's suggested from observations, the Cone of Uncertainty (CoU) is not a valid model of how uncertainty behaves in software development projects. Laird and M.

2007 42

2007 2012 2006 2008 42

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 24, 2018

But before going further, let's establish the definitions we need to understand and apply Root Cause Analysis needed to discover the corrective and preventive actions to increase the probability of project success - especially Software Project Success. What factors lead to software project failure?” All for the want of a nail.

2014 45

2014 Aerospace 2011 2013 45

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Agile Software Development (#ASD). Enterprise IT and Embedded Systems (#EIT).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement 2003 Governance 42

Workzone

AUGUST 4, 2021

This list of alternatives for Asana the project management software will help you identify which project management software you should be using. We’re going to share the top Asana alternative, Workzone, pros and cons of Asana, and 24 other software solutions so you can decide which option is worth researching further.

2021 26

2021 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 26

The IIL Blog

SEPTEMBER 26, 2024

By Luigi Morsa and Richard Maltzman Introduction In a former article on this Blog, we discussed how Artificial Intelligence (AI) software intersects with Project Management [1]. In this article, the aim is to discuss another interesting aspect of the current features of AI software, namely the possibility to contribute to Innovation.

Innovation 88

Innovation Artificial Inteligence Software Review Technical Review 88

BeeWits

JULY 3, 2018

Wrike is a project management software that enables you to collaborate with your team efficiently and effectively. Visit our review here: [link] ). As a company, Wrike is the provider of a cloud-based project management and collaboration software, based in Silicon Valley, the San Francisco Bay Area. Wrike Review.

Software Review 29

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Budget Defining 29

Herding Cats

JUNE 19, 2017

The Cone of Uncertainty is a framing assumption used to model the needed reduction in some parameter of interest in domains ranging from software development to hurricane forecasting. Shrinking The Cone Of Uncertainty With Continuous Assessment For Software Team Dynamics In Design And Development,” Pongtip Aroonvatanaporn,” Ph.D.

Technical Review 35

Technical Review Performance Measurement Underperforming Technical Team Estimate 35

Runrun.it

OCTOBER 1, 2019

The concept originated from software development companies, who found the traditional method of project and workflow management was stifling in many situations. The agile organization and the agile squad. The agile squad is the smallest unit in the agile organization — multiple agile squads are collectively called a tribe.

Agile 20

Agile Software Review Leadership Technical Review 20

Wrike

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

Project Management Software & Tools. Lean & Test Driven Development (TDD) – 11%. Feature Development Driven – 9%. Dynamic Systems Development Method – 3%. Project Management Software & Tools. Most-Wanted Features in Project Management Software: 1. 53% use project management software.

2015 60

2015 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 60

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to estimate software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Cost Modeling Agile Software Development,” Maarit Laanti and Petri Kettunen, International Transactions on Systems and Applications, Volume 1 Number 2, pp. Chakraborty and K.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ‒ Steve McConnell. The Future of Systems-and Software Development. Springer International Publishing, 2016.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2012 64

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. A Critical Review Of Risk Management Support Tools,” Irem Dikmen, M. 3, March 2002. “The

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Teamweek

JANUARY 23, 2020

In their words: Get better at modelling & designing software for complex domains. In their words: DevOpsDays is a worldwide series of community run technical conferences covering topics of software development, IT infrastructure operations, and the intersection between them. Starting at $270. Domain Driven Design.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review 2020 Artificial Inteligence Software Review 52

Project Pulse Journal

APRIL 16, 2024

Whether managing a software development project in an Agile framework or overseeing a service delivery project in a Waterfall context , T-shirt sizing offers a versatile and efficient approach to estimating work, setting the stage for successful project execution and delivery. Based on team feedback, adjust any sizes as needed.

Agile 52

Agile Technical Review Software Review Estimate 52