Digite

JANUARY 7, 2018

262 pages, ET to read: 4 hours, Published April 7th, 2010 by Blue Hole Press). This is the original book where David Anderson first laid down the definition of and guidance to the Kanban Method for software and knowledge work. David Anderson, who is widely regarded as the Kanban Method pioneer published this book in 2010.

Lean 79

Lean Software Review 2010 2014 79

nTask

AUGUST 8, 2019

This helped us to simplify how nTask project management software can be used for solving such issues. Its simplicity and ease of implementation has made it the most popular version of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) for software engineering and IT projects. Waterfall is a popular SDLC project management model.

Software Review 97

Software Review 2019 Development Team Review Technical Review 97

nTask

NOVEMBER 23, 2018

Introduced in 2006, with a major redesign in 2010, the platform serves as a single systematic and flexible solution for all the task management needs of a team. Being able to track the time associated with each and every project is one of the most critical aspects of a project management software. They are: 1.

2019 111

2019 2006 2010 Software Review 111

Leading Agile

NOVEMBER 17, 2020

And in that we grew the company where originally, we did a mixture, as you know, between transformation and building custom software solutions. Over time, we grew to focus more, mainly on customer soft, custom software solutions, and eventually Accenture purchased us. So— – We reconnected, yeah. – Interesting.

Technical Review 112

Technical Review Software Review Agile Government 112

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2018

Microeconomics is applicable to the development is software systems. If we look at the discipline of software engineering, we see that the microeconomics branch of economics deals more with the types of decisions we need to make as software engineers or managers. Software engineering economics." Boehm, Barry W.

Software Development 34

Software Development Software Developers Risk Management Risk 34

Wrike

NOVEMBER 7, 2018

Project Management Software & Tools. Lean & Test Driven Development (TDD) – 11%. Feature Development Driven – 9%. Dynamic Systems Development Method – 3%. Project Management Software & Tools. Most-Wanted Features in Project Management Software: 1. 53% use project management software.

2015 60

2015 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 60

ProProfs Project Management

JANUARY 15, 2021

As a result, 37% of projects fail due to lack of defined project objectives and milestones visually. Anderson was the first person to implement this kanban approach to project management to their IT, Software Development, and knowledge work in 2004. Some are under review, some are open or complete and some are on hold.

Software Review 81

Software Review Technical Review 2004 SCRUM 81

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 5, 2018

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ? This variation can be explained by the fact that initial concepts do not describe the final software system accurate enough.

2012 48

2012 2007 2010 2011 48

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. Nord, CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering , May/June 2013.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Wrike

MAY 23, 2023

I joined the team as a QAA engineer in 2010, the first employee in this role. Together, we have developed a unique quality control system for Wrike, our lovely project management platform, allowing us to deploy product code to production more quickly and without bugs. I’m Alexander, and I’m a QAA manager at Wrike.

Engineering 36

Engineering Underperforming Technical Team Controlling Software Review 36

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

When we hear of the difficulties of making decisions in the presence of uncertainty, especially about software features and capabilities, there are straightforward ways to solve this problem. In our agile software development world, AHP is rarely found. I came to AHP through a seminar by Dr. James T. References . [1]

Technical Review 47

Technical Review 2010 2014 Software Developers 47

Herding Cats

JULY 24, 2017

Shipping on time, to specifications, and within budget might be meaningless if a competitor is shipping software that has a greater value to the market. It's suggested from observations, the Cone of Uncertainty (CoU) is not a valid model of how uncertainty behaves in software development projects. Wallshein, Ph.D. Laird and M.

2007 42

2007 2012 2006 2008 42

Herding Cats

SEPTEMBER 19, 2018

Flight software is always an issue where we work, so those ranges are wider even more. Getting the software qualified is about the same variability as getting it certified, so the same range is used. This is a Closed Loop Control Systems for managing the performance of a Software Intensive System of Systems, all developed using Scrum.

2010 43

2010 Technical Review Estimate Software Review 43

EasyProjects

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

If you follow the instructions to a tee, it’s going to taste fantastic – just like the reviews say. Agile is most popular in the software industry, but it has found homes in the information technology, engineering, product development, and marketing industries to name a few. Deliver code that is extensible.

Agile 41

Agile Technical Review Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 41

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 5, 2018

In software development, those managing the project have some understanding the market forces (from their marketing departments), the technology (from their engineering department), and how to manage in the presence of Aleatory and Epistemic risk (the managers running a successful firm). Software projects are non-ergodic.

Software Review 34

Software Review Technical Review Estimate Software Developers 34

Herding Cats

APRIL 8, 2017

These systems fall into the Software Intensive System of Systems (SISoS) category. The notion that innovation and engineering - software engineering - are somehow in conflict is common. . In the software engineering domain, like the developer domain, design is the basis of this innovation.

Web Development 37

Web Development 2010 Software Engineering Engineering 37

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Agile Software Development (#ASD). Enterprise IT and Embedded Systems (#EIT).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement 2003 Government 42

Wrike

AUGUST 14, 2020

Anderson is often credited as being the first to implement Kanban in software development in 2005. His book on Kanban , published in 2010, is still one of the most comprehensive resources out there for technology-focused projects. This can mean multiple review stages, or reports and metrics communicating performance. .

Software Review 36

Software Review 2005 Technical Review SCRUM 36

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 9, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the Technical category, and the MPUG Activity Code for claiming is on the screen now.

Software Review 52

Software Review Critical Chain Technical Review Risk Management 52

Workzone

APRIL 30, 2020

In 2010 daPulse, created by Wix.com , joined the vast array of project management tools on the market, and in 2017, daPulse went through a transformation to become Monday.com. Designed to come across as colorful and friendly, Monday aims to help you kick your case of the Monday blues through the use of its software.

2020 38

2020 Software Review Technical Review 2010 38

MPUG

JULY 23, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session with PMI is on the screen now.

Risk 52

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

MPUG

JULY 23, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Kyle: Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the MPUG activity code for claiming the session with PMI is on the screen now.

Risk 52

Risk Software Review Estimate Underperforming Technical Team 52

Herding Cats

JANUARY 22, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. ASE’10, September 20–24, 2010, Antwerp, Belgium. . [8] Software Engineering Economics”. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Chulani, S.,

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

Herding Cats

JANUARY 17, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. ASE’10, September 20–24, 2010, Antwerp, Belgium. . [8] Software Engineering Economics”. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Chulani, S.,

Technical Review 28

Technical Review 2005 Estimate Software Review 28

MPUG

MAY 24, 2020

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. The MPUG activity code for claiming the session is on the screen now. I’ve been working on creating blog posts and videos and giving speeches since 2010.

Software Review 40

Software Review Artificial Inteligence Software Developers Software Development 40

Herding Cats

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

Barry Boehm's work in “Software Engineering Economics”. This is due to many reasons. We have a target weight at Test Readiness Review of 23KG. ASE’10, September 20–24, 2010, Antwerp, Belgium. . [8] Software Engineering Economics”. Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice-Hall, 2000. [10] Chulani, S.,

Technical Review 28

Technical Review Estimate 2005 Software Review 28

MPUG

OCTOBER 9, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category and the code for claiming today’s session is on the screen now.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Lean Underperforming Technical Team 40

MPUG

OCTOBER 16, 2019

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. And today’s session is eligible for one PMI PDU in the technical category, and the code for claim that is on the screen now, that’s mpugwebnlearn091819.

Agile 40

Agile Technical Review Software Review Engineering 40

Runrun.it

OCTOBER 1, 2019

The concept originated from software development companies, who found the traditional method of project and workflow management was stifling in many situations. The change in Bank of America’s approach began roughly around 2010, when it hired a new chief information officer, one who championed the use of agile methodology.

Agile 20

Agile Software Review Leadership Technical Review 20

Teamweek

MARCH 4, 2025

One of the biggest players in the talent assessment software arena is Mercer Mettl, but the platform has some flaws. Mettl is a proctoring and talent assessment tool that has been around since 2010. By doing so, they base their hiring decisions on what candidates can actually do (not just what they claim on paper).

2025 59

2025 Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Review 59

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ‒ Steve McConnell. The Future of Systems-and Software Development. Springer International Publishing, 2016.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2005 2006 2013 64

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to estimate software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Cost Modeling Agile Software Development,” Maarit Laanti and Petri Kettunen, International Transactions on Systems and Applications, Volume 1 Number 2, pp. Chakraborty and K.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 255, April 2010. 24, 2010. “A México, 1 al 3 de Febrero de 2006.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Scrum.org

FEBRUARY 26, 2025

Yet, due to widespread usage of the practice, people think that the specific practice is part of Scrum and should be followed to do Scrum in the right way. When I started as a Scrum Master back in 2010, I had my set of practices and I evolved. I am not saying that every Scrum Team should know each and every right or wrong practice.

SCRUM 135

SCRUM 2010 2025 Technical Review 135