Leading Agile

JUNE 18, 2018

Defensive programming consists of learning and using guidelines for software design and coding that tend to minimize the frequency and severity of problems in production. The day came when the software community more-or-less forgot about defensive programming. The Age of the Mainframe. And sleep, too. The Age of the Webapp.

Software Review 101

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Artificial Inteligence 101

Planio

JULY 22, 2020

The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups. Swipe to Unlock: The Primer on Technology and Business Strategy. Technical documentation. Each chapter ends with quick reviews making this a useful “PMBOK for Dummies”. Author: Harvard Business Review. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion.

2020 148

2020 Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review Software Review 148

Leading Agile

FEBRUARY 11, 2019

When I first learned about Agile methods in 2002, the principles seemed to offer an ideal solution to many organizational issues common at the time. How can the same principle be a good idea in 2002 and a bad idea in 2019? When I applied those principles in real-world situations, they worked remarkably well. What has changed?

Agile 116

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Technical Review 116

PM Basics

MAY 19, 2020

“ In 2002 Google got rid of all managers. Interesting to note: While Google’s a technical giant, they rated technical skills as the least important aspect for a manager. AND it only works if you can review the objectives every 3–4 months. What does project management at Google look like? But it’s Google!

2002 128

2002 Technical Review Software Review PMI 128

MPUG

SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

I ventured from a military manufacturing background into the tech industry, initially in a support capacity. Jira’s inception traces back to April 2002, birthed by Atlassian, a company founded by two Australian friends, Mike Cannon-Brooks and Scott Farquhar. Within just three years of its launch, Jira already had 1,000 customers.

Technical Review 52

Technical Review Software Review 2002 Manufacturing 52

nTask

MARCH 10, 2021

In 2002, Bill Wake published in his article the inconsistencies that arise from certain terms that are used within teams, including that if “done.”. This is of no fault due to the developer. That being said, the definition may be steered by the Scrum Master or the head of engineering, or the lead of the technical team.

Software Review 78

Software Review Technical Review 2002 2007 78

LiquidPlanner

APRIL 13, 2022

From the early 1970s, behavioral scientist and 2002 Nobel prize winner, Daniel Kahneman, has been working to help us better understand our cognitive blind spots, specifically when making judgments (or forecasting) under conditions of uncertainty.¹ So why do project teams often fall victim to these biases? 190, 2018. ³D. Hulett Ph.D.

2002 78

2002 Transportation Technical Review 2018 78

Henny Portman

OCTOBER 2, 2020

So, I followed this training and certification in March 2020 (just before the lockdown due to COVID-19) in Vilnius, Lithuania and I was looking forward to the first assignment, hopefully in Asia. The IPMA Project Excellence Model (IPMA PEM) was introduced in 2016 as an updated version of the model that has been in place since 2002.

Software Review 86

Software Review PMO Technical Review 2002 86

Epicflow Blog

APRIL 29, 2022

A risk log should be shared with all project stakeholders and team members and reviewed at every team meeting not to miss any important updates. . Some risk-bearing events will be added to the risk register later – don’t forget that it should be regularly reviewed as a project progresses. . How to Create a Risk Register?

Risk 52

Risk Technical Review Software Review 2008 52

nTask

MARCH 25, 2021

JIRA is a popular tool that was created by the Australian company Atlassian and was launched in 2002. The tool was initially created as purely an issue and bug tracking software but since then has evolved into a system for resolving complex project management issues. The name of the software itself has an interesting origin story.

Software Review 78

Software Review 2002 2021 Technical Review 78

Workzone

FEBRUARY 13, 2025

Why You Might Need a Microsoft Project Alternative Microsoft Project alternatives have been popping up ever since the software was introduced in 1984…1984! Workzone is rated #1 across the board for project management at leading software review sites Capterra , Software Advice , and GetApp.

2024 26

2024 Software Review Technical Review Software 26

Epicflow Blog

MAY 14, 2019

Over 200 PM experts from ExxonMobil, INEOS, DXC Technology, and other companies have shared their experience and proved that it’s a super hot topic. Business drivers have to be translated into project drivers by a strong technical team, not management. Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering by Robert L.

Underperforming Technical Team 65

Underperforming Technical Team Technical Review 2002 Software Review 65

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

The naturally occurring work effort in the development of a software feature - even if we've built the feature before - is an irreducible uncertainty. The Development of Progress Plans Using a Performance–Based Expert Judgment Model to Assess Technical Performance and Risk,” Justin W. They cannot be suppressed or removed. 12, 2008.

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Wrike

APRIL 4, 2010

cloud computing, SaaS and other next-generation technologies that are much talked about, but are not yet understood by everyone in the corporate environment. Later on, I plan to review Andrew McAfee’s “ Enterprise 2.0: After a brief career in corporate HR, I started moving into technology- and system-oriented work.

Technical Review 36

Technical Review 2002 Innovation Consulting 36

Herding Cats

JULY 8, 2018

This advocate continually confuses Macroeconomics of financial markets and sovereign finance with Microeconomics of software development. Here's a book review from 2008, about Black Swans and Fooled By Randomness in the context of managing software development in the presence of uncertainty. Pich, Christoph H.

2002 34

2002 2008 Technical Review Software Review 34

Wrike

AUGUST 24, 2007

Before I start digging into project management transformation due to Web 2.0 technologies, I would like to share some thoughts on the basic impacts of Enterprise 2.0 Experts believe, it prevents companies from fast development and rapid response to market changes due to bureaucracy. on companies’ structure and corporate culture.

Technical Review 36

Technical Review 2002 Underperforming Technical Team 2006 36

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Here's a collection of presentations, briefings, papers, essays, book content used to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS) I've written and applied over my career in the software-intensive system of systems and other domains. Business, Technical, Systems, Risk, and Project Management Briefings and Presentations.

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement 2003 Underperforming Technical Team 42

Workzone

MAY 1, 2020

Based outside Philadelphia, Workzone has been a significant player in the project management world since 2002. Review: “As an administrator, it has been essential for tracking work across departments and to manage timelines. Source: Software Advice. Proofhub is a project planning software tool launched in 2011.

2020 29

2020 2002 Technical Review Software Review 29

Workzone

APRIL 23, 2020

There are over 400 project management software solutions on the market, as of April 2020, according to Software Advice. With so many choices available, you’re likely wondering which software is right for your team. With so many choices available, you’re likely wondering which software is right for your team.

Software Review 26

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team Software Technical Review 26

Workzone

JULY 18, 2022

As of January 2022, there are over 450 project management software solutions on the market, according to Software Advice ! With so many choices available, you’re likely wondering which software is right for your team. Top 3 Benefits of Project Management Software. Ranking the Best Project Management Software.

Software Review 26

Software Review Underperforming Technical Team 2022 Software 26

MPUG

JULY 8, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Whether it is to be additional resources, new technology, market expansion. The organization wants to exploit mobile technology to improve its claims processing.

Technical Review 59

Technical Review 2002 Underperforming Technical Team Estimate 59

Herding Cats

JULY 8, 2018

This advocate continually confuses Macroeconomics of financial markets and sovereign finance with Microeconomics of software development. Here's a book review from 2008, about Black Swans and Fooled By Randomness in the context of managing software development in the presence of uncertainty. Pich, Christoph H.

2002 28

2002 2008 Technical Review Software Review 28

MPUG

DECEMBER 10, 2021

You may wish to use this transcript for the purposes of self-paced learning, searching for specific information, and/or performing a quick review of webinar content. Also, as the President and Founder of Advisicon, Tim has written over 38 books on PM methodologies and technologies. Tim Runcie: I got a good group here today.

Software Review 52

Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team Engineering 52

Workzone

JULY 13, 2021

Yes, we’re actually talking about Airtable, the database software turned project management tool that comes in handy for technical users who like building automation and formulas within spreadsheets. Reviews from the #1 Rated Airtable Alternative: Workzone. Too specific? Did I just overshare? Request a Workzone demo.

2021 26

2021 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 26

Workzone

AUGUST 4, 2021

This list of alternatives for Asana the project management software will help you identify which project management software you should be using. We’re going to share the top Asana alternative, Workzone, pros and cons of Asana, and 24 other software solutions so you can decide which option is worth researching further.

2021 26

2021 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 26

Workzone

JULY 23, 2021

Reviews from the #1 Rated Hive Alternative: Workzone. Here’s a look at Hive’s primary competitors and where they rank according to leading software review site Software Advice. Zoho allows you to add unlimited users on any software plan, at no extra cost. Issues with setting up recurring activities.

2021 26

2021 Software Review 2002 Technical Review 26

Workzone

JULY 6, 2021

Reviews from the #1 Rated Clickup Alternative: Workzone. Workzone ranks #1 across the board against top ClickUp alternatives at leading software review sites Capterra , Software Advice , and GetApp by user reviews. Workzone has been helping teams manage their workflows with precision and success since 2002.

2021 26

2021 Software Review 2002 Budget 26

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

Information about key project cost, (technical) performance, and schedule attributes is often uncertain or unknown until late in the program. This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. Raz and E.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

The primary purpose of software estimation is not to predict a project’s outcome; it is to determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough to allow the project to be controlled to meet them ‒ Steve McConnell. The Future of Systems-and Software Development. Springer International Publishing, 2016.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2006 2005 2013 64

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to estimate software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Cost Modeling Agile Software Development,” Maarit Laanti and Petri Kettunen, International Transactions on Systems and Applications, Volume 1 Number 2, pp. Performance Evaluation of non?Markovian

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

International Institute for Learning

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

Managing a team is definitely something really difficult because in addition, for instance, to the technical complexity of the topic, there is the challenge to coordinate people with different personalities, knowledge, background and even culture with the purpose of making the team work in an efficient way. Schwaber, K. Hackman, J.

Underperforming Technical Team 52

Underperforming Technical Team 2022 Technical Review 2002 52

Leading Agile

AUGUST 20, 2018

An unattended software delivery pipeline frees technical staff to spend more time on value-add activities rather than tediously performing repetitive tasks by hand, such as. Reviewing code by eyeballing it to ensure compliance with coding standards. Handling merges of code changes made by more than one person.

Software Review 77

Software Review Software Technical Review Development Team Review 77

Sandeep Kashyap

OCTOBER 17, 2024

Staff Meeting (✓) 9:00 AM: It also entails a review of the Project Proposal (•) 11:00 AM: Client Call (✓) 2:00 PM: Time for all the team to grab lunch (○) 3:00 PM — Submit Report (•) Next, link with Marketing (→) Invest and implement new CRM software (–) Track progress As the day comes to a close, go through tasks and responsibilities for the day.

Planning 52

Planning 2024 2023 2002 52