This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
What is the business case for Agile teams? We think we do well to base our beliefs about Agile more on evidence. This post is our attempt to bring an evidence-based perspective to the business case of Agile teams. Each post discusses scientific research that is relevant to our work with Scrum and Agile teams.
Scrum/Agile) are more suitable to deal with complex problems because they are more attuned to our cognitive abilities. Why our brain is not built for softwareengineering. It is a mental process and a limited mental resource (Ashcraft, 2002). Cognitive paradigms, applied to Scrum / Agile. This will not work.
This is the motivation for short work intervals found in agile development. . Mazzuchi, and Shahram Sarkani, Systems Engineering , Volume 17, Issue 4, Winter 2014, Pages: 375–391. Hybrid–AgileSoftware Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. The probability of something happening.
Little [8] makes the claim that agile methods don't follow the Cone - that is the uncertainty doesn't reduce as the project proceeds. A Quick Estimation Approach to Software Cost Estimation," Leckraj Nagowah, Hajrah BibiBenazir, and Bachun, African Conference on SoftwareEngineering and Applied Computing , . "A
People who specialize in testing software will need technical skills more-or-less on par with competent softwareengineers. In a 2002 piece entitled The Law of Leaky Abstractions , Joel Spolsky observed that abstractions over any implementation can leak details of that implementation. Contracts vs. Promises.
Donato Piccinno , a Project Manager at DXC Technology, advises to “measure and improve clarity, unity and agility. Facts and Fallacies of SoftwareEngineering by Robert L. Glass ( Addison-Wesley Professional, 2002), also recommended by Giorgio Locatelli. Such an approach is all about being proactive rather than reactive.
This is the same paradigm of Agilesoftware development where responding to change over following the plan is part of the original manifesto. Managing Requirements for Business Value," John Favaro, IEEE Software , March/April 2002. Aligning Software Investment Decisions with the Markets ," Hakan Erdogmus. "
“Believing is Seeing: Confirmation Bias Studies in SoftwareEngineering, “Magne Jørgensen and Efi Papatheocharous, 41st Euromicro Conference on SoftwareEngineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). Planning and Executing Time-Bound Projects,” Eduardo Miranda, IEEE Computer , March 2002, pp. 5 Oct 1990, Page 21.
This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to assess risks, their impacts, and handling strategies for software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. IEEE Transactions on SoftwareEngineering , Vol. 3, March 2002. 11 November 2002. Risk Management Papers. De Meyer, C.
This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. IEEE Transactions on SoftwareEngineering , Vol.
This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to estimate software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Cost Modeling AgileSoftware Development,” Maarit Laanti and Petri Kettunen, International Transactions on Systems and Applications, Volume 1 Number 2, pp. Chakraborty and K.
Agile Risk Management and DSDM Pocketbook , Alan Moran, IARM. Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientist 2nd Edition , Ernest J. Agile Risk Management and Scrum , Alan Moran, Institute for Agile Risk Management, 2014. Henley and Hiromitsu Kumamoto, IEEE Press, 2000.
Compliance became especially important to IT organizations after the passage of certain laws intended to provide improved security for investors, including Sarbanes-Oxley (US, 2002), and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley act (US, 1999). ” They asked me how they could streamline the workflow and move to a more “agile” delivery cadence.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 100,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content