ProProfs Project Management

JANUARY 9, 2020

The Agile project management methodology emerged in 2001, and it is still fast catching up and proving to be a vital tool in the arsenal of most modern project managers. While Agile was designed keeping the software and the IT industry in mind, it has become highly relevant to many other industries around the world. Agile Methodology.

Prince2 122

Prince2 Lean SCRUM Governance 122

The IIL Blog

SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

The History of Agile Project Management Agile project management emerged in the software development industry in the late 1990s and early 2000s. In 2001, a group of software development thought leaders came together and devised the Agile Manifesto. There is clear structure and governance in agile projects.

Agile 88

Agile Underperforming Technical Team Software Review Development Team Review 88

International Institute for Learning

JULY 28, 2022

Scrum has its origins in software development, but about ten years ago, other departments in organizations started looking at becoming more agile and analyzing whether the Scrum approach could also be used in their departments— and in projects. The PMP method is owned by the Project Management Institute (PMI), a US-based company.

Prince2 109

Prince2 SCRUM 2001 Agile 109

Velociteach

MAY 10, 2023

Everything from putting people back on the moon, developing new therapeutics and software, or planning a wedding. More recently, the profession has grappled with two intertwined questions: Should principles or processes govern project management? How could there be only one solution?

Lean 89

Lean Cadence PMI 2001 89

Online PM Courses

SEPTEMBER 16, 2018

Scrum Alliance was the first (2001) major organization to promote scrum, and to offer its certifications. Their certified Digital Agilist qualifications are more software development than project management certifications. Scrum Alliance. Scrum Alliance claims to have issued over 750,000 certifications. Axelos PRINCE2.

Certification 143

Certification Agile Prince2 PMI 143

International Institute for Learning

DECEMBER 21, 2021

Since the Agile Manifesto was written in 2001 by a group of software practitioners, Agile approaches have been taking over the project management scene at a steady pace. It is very common in construction, infrastructure, and government programs. . By Karim Radwin , CAIA, PMP. Some say Agile is a mindset, not a methodology.

Agile 105

Agile Technical Review Construction 2001 105

Herding Cats

MARCH 11, 2017

Hybrid–Agile Software Development Anti–Patterns, Risks, and Recommendations,” Paul E. McMahon, Cross Talk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering , July/August 2015, pp. Architecting Large Scale Agile Software Development: A Risk–Driven Approach,” Ipek Ozkaya, Michael Gagliardi, Robert L. 12, 2008. “A

2003 46

2003 2014 2015 2011 46

Herding Cats

OCTOBER 24, 2018

But before going further, let's establish the definitions we need to understand and apply Root Cause Analysis needed to discover the corrective and preventive actions to increase the probability of project success - especially Software Project Success. Australian Government, Department of Defence, Defence Material Organization, Version 2.0

2014 45

2014 Aerospace 2011 2013 45

Leading Agile

JANUARY 21, 2021

What does it look like when we’re trying to figure out how to do agile governance? Not only at the team level, but at the program level at the portfolio level, at the strategy level, like at the macro level of governance and that was kind of the problem that we really set off to solve. But a lot of times, and you guys know this.

Sustainability 111

Sustainability Agile SCRUM Technical Review 111

Workzone

AUGUST 4, 2021

Jira is the flagship product of Australian software developer Atlassian’s. Jira began as a bug tracking software, but it has grown into a popular project management tool. ProjectManager.com is a robust project planning software developed by ProjectManager.com, Inc. Pricing: Free – $20.83/user/month. user/month.

2021 26

2021 Software Review Technical Review Underperforming Technical Team 26

Herding Cats

NOVEMBER 7, 2016

“Believing is Seeing: Confirmation Bias Studies in Software Engineering, “Magne Jørgensen and Efi Papatheocharous, 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). The Use of Precision of Software Development Effort Estimates to Communicate Uncertainty,” Magne Jørgensen, Software Quality Days.

Estimate 64

Estimate 2005 2006 2013 64

Herding Cats

APRIL 16, 2019

Product Development (#ProdDev). Governance (#Governance). Agile Software Development (#ASD). Six Business System Rule - defines the assessment of the integrated business systems for Federal procurement and their integrity in providing information to the Government contracting office. . Strategy (#Strategy).

Technical Review 42

Technical Review Performance Measurement 2003 Underperforming Technical Team 42

Herding Cats

MAY 7, 2019

Effort Distribution to Estimate Cost in Small to Medium Software Development Project with Use Case Points,” Putu Linda Primandari and Sholiq, The Third Information Systems International Conference, Procedia Computer Science, 72, pp. Bool, CrossLink: The Aerospace Corporation, Winter, 2000/2001, pp. 61, September 2004.

Estimate 40

Estimate Software Review Software 2012 40

Herding Cats

MAY 10, 2019

Project risk management: lessons learned from software development environment,” Young Hoon Kwak and Jim Stoddard,” Technovation , 24(11), pp. Project Risk Management: Lessons Learned from Software Development Environment,” Y. Recent trends of Risk Management in Software Development: An Analysis,” Raghavi Bhujang and V.

Risk Management 38

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 38

Herding Cats

MAY 11, 2019

This blog page is dedicated to the resources used to manage the risk encountered on software-intensive systems using traditional and agile development methods. Let's start with a critical understanding of the purpose of managing risk on software development projects. 5887, 2009. Risk a Feelings,” George F. Kwak and J.

Risk Management 35

Risk Management Risk Technical Review 2002 35